Saturday, November 3, 2012
Chapter 10 Question 2
Wootan and Liodice
are having different perspectives on the topic of regulating food advertising
to children. Wootan states that the rates of obesity have doubled in children
and tripled in teens. He believes the guidelines will be helpful to improve
children’s diets. However, I think that will be doing too much to restrict what
to eat for children. In Liodice’s opinions, he states in the first sentence in
the article that free speech is the most important right in America. Thus, free
speech is the basis of choice and personal responsibility. The guidelines gives
him a feeling of compel which means that will be lack of freedom once the
guidelines is being addressed. After reading both perspectives base on the
diet, I stand on Liodice’s side because he gives out sufficient reasoning and
valid information to support his point. I think Liodice makes a better argument
especially because he claims clearly about the freedom of speech in the
beginning of the article.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment